your still thinking from the HOPE of a 2merkle soft activation where people move to segwit tx's..
No. You are confused again and need to re-read what I was talking about. You mentioned Segwit into a statement that had nothing to do with it, and lots again.
by lowering the txsigops (not fake the maths) you can both allow more tx's in and reduce the CPU demand of native tx's
Both points are wrong. This:
1) Does not allow for more TXs. All it does is disable some use-cases which require more sigops.
2) It does not reduce CPU demand at all. Those 1k sigops still have quadratic validation time.
P.S you forget to remind yourself that segwit linear time is ONLY IF people move to segwit keys (which malicious pools/spam users wont do) so stop trying to assume segwit will help, because pools/users that want to be malicious wont use segwit keys
I did not forget anything and have already told you the answer to your nonsense. A malicious actor will be strongly weakened by the prioritization of native ->Segwit and Segwit -> Segwit transactions.