Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Topic OP
Lauda, he's right or not?
by
VINSIN
on 06/05/2017, 23:33:57 UTC
I saw many topic that are going in this direction and I wasn't expected to find something like this.

I got really mad seeing that I got a red trust from the user: "lauda" . Ok I get it. He is trusted by trusted and trusted by not  so trusted. I'm not here to talk about actions that happened in past (i read the last topics).

For the first time, well i had another ocassions but nothing important, i wanted to join a bitcoin paid signature. I understand the idea of spaming tough. I can say a little I spammed (if I need to think from his/her point of view), I understand the fact the he/she has all the right to kick me out of it.

But I don't understand the idea of giving me a red trust for this.

What spam I did? I joined 2 days ago and today I made 10-15 replies to some topics, you all can read my replies. There were no one word posts or whatever.

We all know the forum trust system got to a point that really sucks and quality of posts is really down, but still I don't see the point as a DT user to destroy a person's account for this kind of reason.

Now I will try to say it like how life goes on. There are always spammers in all the areas, everyone know that they are spammers but their image is not blacked or painted like it is here. For example 5 minutes ago I wanted to do a trade with a newbie who asked me to go first because i have red trust.

I not even noticed that I am not allowed to do all the posts required in a day or whatever, i had some free time and i wanted to do all of them now, a simple message where I could be warned. I understand the point of view of a company who does accept signature campaigns but still.

Sure many of you will come with a reply haters gonna hate but at a point for a good evolution of what this forum is something must be changed.