Why do we
need a Lite-version at all, if you could do this stuff you showed on the testnet?
I never said, that we need a lite wallet. The community just showed interest in a lite wallet because the "full features" are partly unstable, not tested well enough, and things would still need some time. But who am I to decide, my vote (and I hope this is this way because we are a democratic project) is only worth a fraction - exactly as much as my XEL holdings weigh in a vote.
So if someone starts a vote, I will vote for no. But if yes wins, I can assist with coding (not launching).
Let's make sure we know what we would be voting on and if it is even feasible?
Yes Vote:
1) I assume a lite-version would entail a nearly as-is version, with small updates to make it launch ready?
2) Even if we had such a version, what does "launching it" entail? Connecting to Exchanges? Is anyone working on that? Know how to do it? What else would be needed to launch? Anyone with expertise in these steps? I mean we will need that info eventually anyway.
No Vote:
Means development continues as is and we get publicity, funding, and PR through other routes. Probably a creation of a foundation and people jumping to help unvoid and all with the creation of more content and web/SM presence.
The only reason I am/could be for it, is to attract more talent and attention. I think we are at an impressive place and anyone watching the latest videos will be impressed.
I'm against a lite-version if it seems unfeasible or a full-version has only a short to-do list.
Either way, the project is awesome. I really get happy to check the different threads. Very interesting.