I believe in God and concede there is no scientific proof of his existence - nor will it ever be likely to prove it scientifically.
That's why it's called "belief".
Nothing in Science says "God does not exist".
Now, people that believe in things that fly in the face of modern science (ie: Flat Earthers, water having memory and other holistic bullshit...) well, that's another story altogether.
That's why it's called "belief".
Nothing in Science says "God does not exist".
Now, people that believe in things that fly in the face of modern science (ie: Flat Earthers, water having memory and other holistic bullshit...) well, that's another story altogether.
Nothing in science says God exists, why would it say it doesn't exist if it doesn't even assume it does? I agree with people who chose to believe understanding it is their belief. It is your right to do so and I have no interesting in proving you wrong since your belief does not affect me in any way and it helps you.
Too bad you can't understand the proof that God exists. Cause and effect show that everything is programmed - EVERYTHING - by Whomever or Whatever started cause and effect. Complexity, including the complexity of feelings, mind, and emotion show that there was this or greater such complexity in the Programmer. Entropy shows that there was a beginning... a time before there was anything of the universe at all.
I don't blame you for not easily being able to understand these science laws, and put them together to prove to yourself that God exists. What you are to be blamed for is your ranting, and unreasonable trolling without being able to rebut, step by step, the science involved with proving the existence of God.
If the things that I say were all that there was, there might be a little doubt that held some value. But, simply Google "How does science prove that God exists?" to see that there is all kinds of science that proves God exists.
