All this money (billions) could be on segwit if we weren't on this stalemate situation.
atleast you are admitting subtly segwit is an altcoin instead of your old rhetoric that segwit is bitcoin and anything else running on bitcoin is the altcoin. one step in the right direction.
as for the social drama of bu vs core.
funnily core has a speak no evil about their own bugs for 30 days after fix is released, but REKT anything not core as soon as issue is found.
very professional and independent (sarcasm)
read all the core devs saying how release info on exploits within 30 days of fix is bad.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10364kinda hypocritical
It's funny how you always find a way to ignore reality and assemble your arguments in a way that makes you think you are correct. "Oh he said segwit instead of BTC, lol he admited it's an alt!!"
It's time to adjust reality with facts: Coin adopting Segwit = price up. BUcoin crashing = price up.
The price was up anyway, it's irrelevant whether or not the number of BU nodes went down. The BU nodes are only a tiny percentage of the total nodes anyway because Core is the reference client. It really is pointless to pick out a correlation and argue that it means something. A meaningful correlation would be something like: "Known Bitcoin users' average lifespan is decreasing and the amount of lost coins is rising".
Note to franky - SegWit is a backwards compatible protocol upgrade. It's
impossible for it to be an altcoin. Hard forks, however, are not backwards compatible. Equally, people who owned Bitcoin in 2014 automatically owned CLAM as well, doesn't make CLAM Bitcoin.