Not really (embarrassed).  I understand better what you were trying to say, though, so I apologize for my tone.  The way I see it, the low price lowered the barrier to entry into the Bitcoin world for all of those who were not aware of it until recently.  It was the greedy who lost (fiat) money and learned a lesson...  They chose to remain enslaved by trying to get rich instead of buying into the concept.  To me, "pig" is an accurate label for these people.  I don't see anything hypocritical about calling such people a name that originated in the world in which they choose to live.
Bitcoin "believers" on the other hand are better off -- both in terms of freedom and coincidentally in terms of what the other world might call their "portfolio".  Is there greed?  Certainly... lots of it.  But there's still a revolution occurring, even if the general public is to blinded by greed to see it.