Malleability has never been an issue except to people who imagined it to be one. Just wait for a confirmation or two.
Yes I am aware that it is not really that big of an issue. But as an improvement for the protocol it will be always good for the longterm.
Even if it was a problem, can you give a technical explanation why SegWit is required to address malleability double spends???
Segwit is required to open the network for other technologies to be developed on the network. Do you deny that Segwit improves and makes Bitcoin more secure and robust?