*edit, to those replying in a completely off topic way, please some some reproducible and demonstrable evidence to back your viewpoint and you'll get a lot further with your attempts at convincing other to your own opinion.
This is a very poor attitude to take, you should remember that you do not run bitcointalk and it is an open discussion board. Customers have brought up a point, which you have specifically tied to Keyois in a blog post and now you are hiding instead of justifying your reasoning. I don't know much about this BTU/Segwit detail, but I can see someone dodging important questions a mile away.
It is true I did not reply to the off-topic posts but I believe I have already said all there is to say on the matter.
I go with what the data and anlysis say, and at this point that is Not full blocks.
Please note that I stated I favored what the data said and asked for data which disputed it and no data to dispute it came.
As far as I am concerned I will keep sticking with the data, if there is any data to support full blocks I would be very interested to see it. If there is any data to suggest segregated witness as softfork is better than a mainchain data cap increase I would happily look at it. Yet I see no data that disputes me and only data to validate my current opinion.
If you would be so kind as to tell me what questions I have 'dodged' I would be happy to address them.