Where’s the inconsistency with what I’ve written? Price speculation has nothing to do with Dev integrity, does it? All targets were met (okay, except for the .001, but I still have until July, and for those of you who still haven't read my post giving further explanation on that one, I'll just say ). What more do you want? I mean, what more do you want for free? The next levels are buy levels, but, hey, with attitudes like what I’m seeing here, maybe I’ll just forget about posting those.

Dev integrity and price speculation do meet when there are major revelations though, and today’s public accusation is one of those. Credibility falls drastically when you falsely accuse someone, more so when that someone has been a long term positive contributor, and even more so when the data is twisted, manipulated, and misrepresented.

The 40 BTC, for example, was for a fully refundable escrow account upon NDA completion.

What? You people don’t want to hear “negatives” even when they are true? Are you sure about that?