I will appreciate your analyses, regardless its positive or negative if its objective analyses. But you sound upset and I get the feeling its getting personal for you, and if thats the case, I won't be able to trust your objectivity. Plus you are contradicting yourself. First your price estimate is ridiculously high and then you give it worse odds than Las Vegas casino. I didn't like your .001 prediction or arguments you gave to back it up, and I don't like your negative analyses either. Both of them are biased, based on emotion not on logic.
Agreed, I tried bringing it up again but his backup for it was still 'anything can happen' and then gave an article to another coin rising 1000% (We'd need to hit 1000 SAT and THEN rise 1000% to get to 0.001 by the way and he had no reason to say why we'd follow suit). Your 'analysis' isn't backed up by anything real and always seems to sway wildly to the extremes (here and in other threads) and that's why people don't take kindly to your aggressive turn of face, which to your own admission comes right after the DGB devs turned down a deal you offer them

. Likewise I would hope the DGB devs can keep these matters private in the future. For the first time since the initial rise from 20 SAT I'm getting concerned, only mildly but I thought I'd add my 2 cents to the matter.
In the meantime I'm seeing lots of people on twitter trying to make a case for DGB on other exchanges, keep it up guys and keep up the positive image of DGB that you all worked hard to achieve.