I rest my case. Everyone has said their piece and anyone with a cent of common sense can see what there is to see here and make their appropriate decisions.
When someone attacks you publicly accusing you of trying to extort them when they actually turned down the business deal of their lives, and then so calmly turns the world upside down and calls you the attacker, well, we all know what that is, or at least those of us who are successful do (because being successful means staying clear of those types).
Good luck Jared.
_______________________________________________________________________________ ________________
I made lots of money with DGB and I'll always remember it fondly, something that could have been great, but it's time to say goodbye. Always best to leave while you're a winner.
Oh, by the way, did anybody think to ask just how DigiByte got on CryptoID? They're soooo busy that they can't even document what they're doing (not even release notes? that should be a cut and paste of the coding . . . more or less . . . anybody with just a little exposure to that knows what I'm talking about), can't get anything right with lightweight wallets, DiguSign, etc., and complain about you reporting the issues, do you think it was DigiByte? Hell no! They don't want you to have that much blockchain info. They don't want you to have a rich list. Has anyone checked to see if what Jared said yesterday really jives with the real data rich list?
If you are answering these questions with a "no", or "don't know", do yourself a favor and do a reality check. That's just one of many examples too. And if you're asking what the others are, go back and read again, starting in 2014. And if you're too lazy, then save yourself the pain and start looking at the 2nd generation cryptocurrencies - many are already doing what DigiByte says it wants to someday do (without a road map of course, we all know the drill by now, maybe it'll change again, but by that time someone else will have it implemented - a day late, a dollar short). With these kinds of attitudes, complacency and arrogance, they wouldn't be able to make this thing successful even if someone gave it to them.
Just my assessment. Good luck with yours.
And don't blame me. 350 is still a phenomenal cash out level.
Cheers
This is an open source project and community; majority wins. If you really think it was such a great business deal, you can present it here. If the community believes it's great, then it will be the direction. If it's really that great, someone else will take you up on the offer. DGB doesn't need any one person to promote an idea or direction. If they are against DGB best interest, the majority will decide the path forward. Anyone can promote DGB. Anyone can contribute to the code, or direction of the project.
There is no reason for this bickering. You sound like a millennial. Too much good contribution from you over the years to succumb to this.