Maybe you're right, however, it has nothing to do with this topic. But, a scammer has no right to denounce others.
Of course that he/she has the right to do this as long as what is presented is valid. The validity of something is entirely dislocated from the person who is presenting it. At least, that is how it should be if you were to follow the principles of logic.
I am quite disappointed with it. I thought they would give the most satisfactory explanation. No explanation.
Indeed. Maybe it would be better to wait till they pay out the existing bounties and then tag them.
What do you think @Zepher?