Thanks for those answers they are very promising actually.
I think we should evaluate if it will take- a few weeks of coding to address the issues via a node/collateral system
If then after this it would be superior to using zcash or other methods of anon.
I guess it boils down to work vs rewards of improving XC current version of mixing or switching out for a new variation.
I would say with evidence of XC being worked on again it will not be hard to bring forth a community around it once again.
Just keeping this thread active will snag new members all the time and once XC really is match for some other big anons ie the mixer is fixed or we move to another variation of anon then we can start comparing on the main alt board for even more interest.
I'm not sure the current mixing approach should be developed any further as Zero Knowledge Proof's are more anonymous than on-chain mixing. I'm thinking the best solution would be to have a 2nd "token" within XC which is a zk proof/snark type token or ring sig based
that's a very interesting idea..
something like bytes and black bytes in bb?
have you a good idea how it would work and how you would code it out already?
What time frame would you expect to publish if you were to put a road map out now for it?
also is there an updated windows qt link the one in the OP does not work?
thanks
I fixed the OP for the windows download, the osx wallet will be on the auto-build system by tuesday
I do have a very good idea on how it would work but haven't done any POC code .. maybe 4 to 6 weeks for the coding
thanks that's cool.
Well with these projects a road map if it is a serious one detailing the coming implementations and a new ANN thread with some nice looking graphics can create a lot of interest.
The thing i notice about you guys and actually david zimbeck is that you create great things but I don't think you guys market it enough before creations. Everyone else here is selling future dreams for 100's millions and you guys seem to wait and program in secret only briefly announcing things once they are coded and ready.
Investors buy dreams here but I think you and DZ can actually come good on your plans so these roadmaps can be marketed with more confidence than far larger projects.
Blocknet if it can get a good UI and be used via a website is going to be huge, even more so after people do not have to have the entire chainz on their local machines. I mean without doubt that project is going to be huge.
XC again if it has a solid role on blocknet ( i am not 100% clear what its role is with blocknet) and have top level anon and the other features you mention again with a masternode or if not masternode some other form of incentive to accumulate and hold ... a governance system for decentralised voting and funding mechanism ...then you are talking about another hugely marketable project.
Both of the projects can be huge and can be marketed right now on their road maps alone if they are realistic time frames and you have clear idea of how to code them out.
Of course I think bittrex could be persuaded to take back XC if they saw a great road map ahead. Apparently they are not charging now they just want very innovative and exciting projects.