Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Scientific proof that God exists?
by
BADecker
on 21/05/2017, 00:36:55 UTC
Badecker is a religious fanatic, of course he would deny evolution. He believes himself to be some kind of renowned scientist, he reinterprets and redefines scientific laws, he believes in God but he is not religious, he is a God himself as he knows God's will, he understands how God is and he is also kind to forgive us for our blasphemy. He might also talk to God and save us from his wrath if we maybe say that he is right and the rest of the world as we know it is not. He does with science the same that he does with his religion. He claims in its name but denies it. Some might say he is full of himself but I have to disagree. He is not full of himself. He is full of shit.
 Cool


Horacewoodwood is a religious fanatic. He comes to a science thread like this one, and all he can do is talk religion.

Cool
Where is the science here, I fail to find any. All I could find is an idiot who thinks he is a scientist but barely understands how and why he breathes. You are still full of shit and you have absolutely nothing to do with science. You are a religious fanatic who would do anything to make people believe God exists.

It is easy to make a scientific determination that your talk is religious. All we need do is take a scientific look at the things that you say.

Cool