The odds are calculated at 49.95% which is what an old dice casino had as odds, it doesn't matter if its lower or higher, the point is to illustrate how using martingale is a waste of time and it's worse than playing a single bet
if you use 40% you can use a smaller multiplier, and hitting 40% is better than hitting 33%, but playing 40% alone will destroy you. If you look at the odds, you switch when it tells you to.
oh yeah btw i was using d'alambert style bets, not martingale.The thing is as I said it doesn't matter what % you use, it's pointless and never going to be better than other ''strategies'' like one single bet to not waste time. There was another calculated ''strategy'' by dooglus showing how a single sequence of martingale was almost the best ''strategy'' in terms of odds, it would give you like a 0.1% extra, still obviously not a winning strategy.
Well never win in dice game i already follow almost 8 videos in youtube and dailymotion before but never make any good result almost all are the same but sometimes there are some game that can stay long.. with the strategy but in the end still the same you will be lose..
So i think gambling are made only to give entertainment.. so doing this strategy still a good strategy the same as martingale.