Re: The Barry Silbert segwit agreement with >80% miner agreement.
Lulz, Core says they are gonna force everyone to accept what they want, and that's apparently OK.
Then a large % of the mining industry says they're gonna make a minor change to core code, include segwit, but with an 80% activation ...
I'm yet to see where these years of testing that the lousy core coders have done has been decided to be discarded.
OK switch the signalling bit and change a 1 to a 2
Lulz OP FUD.
Seriously do you have no idea about coding and what's already in the core code? Apparently NOT!
This is a joke beyond belief.
A solution that accepts segwit and a 2MB block size and the core fanboys go ape shit coz they don't get it activated in the manner they want.
What a joke.
Then a large % of the mining industry says they're gonna make a minor change to core code, include segwit, but with an 80% activation ...
I'm yet to see where these years of testing that the lousy core coders have done has been decided to be discarded.
OK switch the signalling bit and change a 1 to a 2
Lulz OP FUD.
Seriously do you have no idea about coding and what's already in the core code? Apparently NOT!
This is a joke beyond belief.
A solution that accepts segwit and a 2MB block size and the core fanboys go ape shit coz they don't get it activated in the manner they want.
What a joke.
I would be ok with a blocksize increase because being objective, UASF contains reasonable risks to worry about (even tho is still a valid tool, but if we can avoid it it would be better), but their roadmap is rushed. A hardfork must bring something more to the table than 1MB increase, there are other technologies we must implement in a hard fork that those guys are ignoring because they are not fit to make technological decisions. And don't get me started about getting the Rootstock scammers to replace Bitcoin Core:
https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/866511081463828480
This is obviously the big hand of Bitmain bribing everyone while compromising code quality.
Lets do this right. Im ok with a blocksize increase, but let's not kick Core out and putting some idiots on board in return if you don't want to suffer the consequences eventually (see BU)
So it is O.K. for big mining companies to make deals without asking the community's opinion behind the closed doors but it is not O.K. to change the PoW algo to prevent these kind of situations.
I didn't sign up for a centralized piece of shit coin and a toy for big companies.
We must drain the swamp.
I didn't sign up for a centralized piece of shit coin and a toy for big companies.
We must drain the swamp.
Most bitcoin investors have been asking for bigger blocks for years now.
Complete bullshit lies, troll. Most want Segwit first.
Bigger block proposals were around for a long time before segwit even existed. Anyway its not up to me, its up to the miners.
It's up to you too as long as we have the power to run full validating nodes, but you want to get rid of that so it's 100% about the miners and take it up the ass like the little cuck bitch you are.