@clockuniverse, can you add the Dash Governance Proposal link in the first page? So everyone can easily see this.
My idea is that the percentage of mined coins allocated to the master nodes and the foundation address, should also be voted by the governance system.
What do you think?
Everyone is free to operate the master nodes including the miners. So let's vote it and decide what's the proper number.
The split is hard coded, and both the miners and masternodes are equally important. They serve different functions but both help secure the network, and later the masternodes will have more functions as we add features.
That is cool!
Noticed that Terracoin addresses are interchangeable with Bitcoin addresses.
But what does it imply? Is there any practical use of it?
You can export your private key from Bitcoin or Terracoin (or Mastercoin or Devcoin) and import it into the other wallet making your address the same. If, for example, you accidentally sent Bitcoin to a Terracoin address then you could export your private key from Terracoin, then important it into Bitcoin. Then you would have your coins. I just found out about this like two weeks ago.
What will happen if suddenly all the miners decide to stop mining?
If all the miners stopped mining then the coin would be dead. It would look like the link I posted about vircurex. No one is mining that blockchain so all they can do is sell their TRC and get out the Bitcoin (or other altcoin).
I seriously doubt that would happen though because Terracoin is merge mined so it doesn't take any extra hash to mine it while you mine something else. I also know of one mining pool that is very eager for us to implement the DASH code because it makes Terracoin more valuable.
Without innovation Terracoin will slowly crumble into nothing.
I have spent too much time and effort rebuilding the community to let that happen. I'll have news in the Weekly Update on Thursday. I usually post it early on slack so that people can proof read it, and put in suggestions.
Thanks!