Are you taking now Kolins part ?
Cause everyone can instantly check the proof themself.
Just go to the beginning of that thread where people who tried mining the coin in the first days (meaning quickly big amount of coins) just got orphans .Why orphans ?A known strategy of scam coins so the developer could harvest them himself.
Kolin wrote that he was using during that time many Rack Servers to mine that coin at the beginning.
Of course just coincidents right ?
Like the coincident that only Kolin had a direct contact with Max who btw never revealed his real identity (why?)
Later in 2014 Kolin published Bill Stills wallet ID to make donations so everyone could check Bill Stills wallet and the amount he got and from whom he got.
In 2014 people started to read the Blockchain which people can check on that thread too and discouvered all the big wallets with the millions and millions of coins 10-45 millions per account.Everything has been posted on that thread with proof so Max and Kolin got nervous and started splitting these accounts.However anyone with a working brain can check how many coins have been dumped during that time to kill that coin and when checking the wallets which have been found you can instantly see that they didnt even dumped 1/5 of their coins.
Remember Quark was at $0.35 per coin and only 20.000.000 coins were needed to kick Quark to the nirvana.The major account alone had 45.000.000 coins.
He could instantly kill Quark anytime even when Quark would cost $1 per coin.And these accounts still exist.
Trace the coins from the old big wallets and you will see that these coins havent been touched since the split of the accounts just waiting to get DUMPED FOR REAL MONEY
Thule, I am hardly taking Kolin's part. I am trying to rectify the damage Kolin did. The only coins I own are ones I have purchased myself. I am trying to restore Quark to what it should have been, for the sake of the investors who historically were hurt, while providing a good foundation for further development. Bitcoin was heavily centralized early on, and there have been many people involved with it through the years are were less than reputable.
First of all arround 50% is being hold in a few peoples hand.That was at bitcoin never the case in that high %.Second the people who had a high % of bitcoin never dumped them to exchange worthless coins to money in a big way.Third bitcoin has a strong community was the first coin on the market and more important is being developed non stop.
What has quark ?50% of coins in a few peoples hand.A scam history,No updates for years,No community and not even being innovativ at todays time.
You would love if i would tell you from where Quark has his additonal securit technology.
You know what a hard fork is ?The old community wanted to start a hard fork to kill the big accounts.Guess who was against it ?Max and Kolin and you can trust me they will never allow to touch their accounts to get a fair distribution.
Also quark is being promoted as the decentralised money system alternative.50% at their hands is decentrelised ?Even the propaganda "idea" behind Quark has lost it sense when people know these wallets exist
Thule, the development aspect is being worked on right now. Full stop. We have been working on getting more hands involved so that development can ramp up. The other stuff I can't corroborate or disprove conclusively. Again - coins can only be sold once. Many many coins (Doge, Nxt, many early ICOs, DASH/Darkcoin) have had large centralized numbers of coins, Quark, if this is true, is not unique in this. Your point on development is well taken and is being worked on.