Hmm... Seems like I have to correct a mistake that both Masha and af-newbie made.

You seem to understand my words as "they're proud warriors only trying to fight the evil western nations"

This is NOT what I'm saying. This is what YOU understand. And I'm not responsible for you trying to put ideology in my words.

I'll be as clear as possible:

-The West attacks the Middle East, destabilizes it and take everything they can
-As a consequence, extremism both in politics and religion rises to new ATH
-Western world in general is perceived as a threat to their existence (which is quite true)
-Western world is attacked by anything Middle East can launch

That's all.

That does NOT MEAN:
-The "terrorists" are brave soldiers fighting back invaders
-Anyone attacked by "terrorist" deserves to die
-West is completely guilty for everything

I KNOW that West and East fought for decades. Trying to say "this one attacked first" would not only be impossible, it would be stupidly useless.
I KNOW that the people making bombs aren't necessarily people who got directly involved in the previous wars.
I KNOW that people attacked are not always responsible. ISIS attacked Sweden guys, Swedish never attacked anyone since WW2

What I SAY is that YOU CAN'T bomb, attack, loot entire nations, kill hundreds of thousands of innocents and expect everything to be alright.
We created this threat and it born only from our warmongering behaviour. West is guilty as a whole, from a global perspective, it doesn't imply every citizen did it consciously.

That's all I'm saying and all I said. If you understood something else then please read again.