its fine i can see it thanks! any early bonuses? this project will be amazing btw

"50% of all fees per trade on the exchange will be automatically distributed to addresses with NVOT
on a weekly basis in the form of NVOS when the exchange is production ready. NVOS will have a
fixed price of $0.99 and can be traded for Bitcoin automatically using Counterparty exchange or
through the validator without fees. NVOT price will not be fixed and will be decided by the market."

I definitely hope so...

Do you have an agenda for updates ??

Just some thoughts from me, may be self-evident but perhaps worth stating anyway:

- centralised exchanges typically owned by some single entity (e.g. a company);  decentralised exchange arguably able over time (more and more, or at least somewhat) to be 'owned' / steered / influenced by those people who use it, who add liquidity to it, who contribute to the sourcecode, who lead the community.  In other words, avoid the downside of 'shared fate' if single owner does something you don't like one day

- centralised exchanges possibly can be audited/tracked by governments, tax authorities;  decentralised exchange can use privacy/encryption/other means to keep our transactions away from 'unwanted eyes' of the tax man, the police man, etc when they decide to go silly on us sometimes

- question of scale:  peer-2-peer nature of decentralised exchange means capacity probably linearly scales as more nodes add themself to the network;  centralised exchanges typically rely on single owner knowing how to build a scalable website that can service the users - ask Poloniex how this feels!

- centralised exchange is like Amazon/Facebook/Google website; decentralised exchange is like bittorrent.  Arguably: no central decision point, no central server, no central owner to monetise the users' patronage of their service, decide on what content is allowed, exploit your viewing habits, sell your browser history, track your usage for surge pricing model.  In other words, exploit you for their gain

- decentralised exchange is like Linux;  centralised exchange is like Windows.  Open source, crowd sourced means you harness a wide user base who can (potentially) steer, improve and take ownership of the project over time to increase its usefulness, like Linux.org.  Try telling Microsoft how to steer/improve Windows codebase over time.

- decentralised exchange depends on users trading with each other, users decide what is traded, what is bid, what is offered, users generate the price discovery and market depth as it suits us;  centralised exchange relies on single owner entity acting as market maker, providing liquidity, clearing trades, conducting the market, deciding what to offer, policing rogue traders/HFT's

- centralised exchanges often give preferential treatment (discounts, trading costs, IPO's) to large clients ("whales");  much less likely under decentralised exchange / open source / P2P model

- centralised exchange assumes it can legally avoid or pass off mistakes to us bag holders (tax payers, bail outs, Bernie Madoff, GFC, 'moral hazard', FDIC);  decentralised exchange less likely to require 'bail in' from the user base

.

Twitter, FB bounty?

I don't think you should compare NVO ICO's launched to others ICO's. Everything is black and white in the website. And escrows is all fully trusted as well. So I don't know what's holding you back as far is investing is concern.

Hello NVO!

Please feel free to Link or RT: https://twitter.com/themoonparadigm/status/868437520601669634

All Sorted out the NVO team & Lauda.

Great support with my investment issue.

Thanks guys