Welshminer, just caught your response there.

I did not declare it has no value. I declared it has no clear value. There's a difference. Its current monetary value is not what is being discussed.

Why are you bringing up burden of proof and presumption of innocence? Nobody is on trial here. If you want to state that I must back up my position - I did just that (or attempted to). I'm not even sure I hold a position. It's more like an agnostic viewpoint.

Also, I'm not disputing that you own ICN.

This is getting silly. You are obviously not an idiot, and neither is Daparski. And I'm pretty sure I've demonstrated that I'm not an idiot either.

With that, I must insist on a close to this, and just let our posts stand as they are, for people to decide for themselves. There's no point arguing back and forth ad infinitum. We're clearly not going to reach a middle ground, and we're just clogging up the thread.

I will offer you this link, though, if you haven't read the comments here already:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ICONOMI/comments/6d9ci1/where_the_the_value_of_the_icn_token_derived_from/

Deanjks makes some interesting points. If you're on reddit, maybe you can chime in there too.

Cheers!

Edit: Oh, one last thing... can you point me to what you're referring to in the contract here:


... I don't see any proof of anything there. What do you mean, exactly?