There is a tab "Read contract" you can query your balance there to see the proof of ownership.
You can also explore contract address
https://etherscan.io/address/0x888666CA69E0f178DED6D75b5726Cee99A87D698No doubt everyone's perception of value is different.
What I was trying to say is that every statement should be justified and backed by proof.
I tried to prove the fact that Iconomi's decision to do buybacks instead of paying dividends does not adversely affect it's value or makes it unclear and in no way makes ICN as useless as and abstract MEND token.
This discussion can go on for ever - must admit it is better to leave it where it is.
I will give it one more try...
That proves ownership of ICN. Not ownership of Iconomi. That's my whole point. The token and the platform aren't the same thing, and there's nothing linking them together - other than the buybacks. But anybody can buy them, or create support levels. This doesn't demonstrate that your ICN token is linked to Iconomi's assets or profits, or why Iconomi's success should increase the value of ICN. The market doesn't care who is providing support levels. This works different with regular shares. With ICN, it's just a case of "here's your token. This represents Iconomi" and we just have to believe that based on... what?
The only people who will buy this, in future, are the ones who don't see that problem.
This is probably why Iconomi are trying to create a new use for the token. Why would they bother inventing a new use for it otherwise?
Anyway, unless Iconomi can solve this, I predict this outcome: ICN will become a token used to complete actions on the platform. And that will be its only value.
I predicted that dividends would be scrapped, by the way. So if I'm right about this, I expect you all to kiss my sweaty feet

Goodnight!
(If I'm wrong, I'll send Daparski 100 dogecoin)