So, do tell me how you reach the conclusion that the developer is honest, especially considering that everybody behind this operation is anonymous.
He is Chinese, and he does not fully understand what he says.
If he is anonymous how do you claim to know this to be true?
Cryptocurrencies is the world where is the anonymity should be respected!
Why you did not leave your negative trust to ... Satoshi Nakamoto, etc.?
Bitcoin is a decentralised p2p trustless system, we do not need to trust in Satoshi Nakamoto to look after our bitcoin.
Crypto DAO is a centralised exchange run by anonymous people who are in control of the funds their users send them.
In that this requires their users trust them not to steal their money, which part of the repeated instances of dishonesty from the operators of this exchange suggests that they are not only trustworthy but sufficiently trustworthy to be in control of other people's money?