Very little communication with Bytecoin devs.
I don't think their in-house talk thread is find-able.
I'm still receiving notifications from their Github each time somebody posts there.
And their alleged Twitter account, though they don't tweet much any more -- they do follow you when you make a little noise about them.
Thank you for the article ... yes, very interesting ... I'm going LONG BCN
Reads like every other article they produce - shit on anything that forked and actually gained significant value, and then go on and on about what a great scam coin BCN was for being "first".. It's 100% bullshit unless you are a BCN bagholder looking to finally dump.
Nice article but a bit biased though.
The article in question is provocative -- on purpose -- I think.
I am still waiting for a reputable organization to release a new investigative piece on the CryptoNote guys. But "reputable" is a charged word. Even the New York Times has had its share of Fake News 'Reporters' etc.
BitcoinTalk and Monero Threads that smell something, but don't really substantiate the allegations, just aren't good enough for the real world. It's not a "court of public opinion."
All coins need to be better investigated, but that is difficult given the "virtual" playing field.
I don't think their in-house talk thread is find-able.
I'm still receiving notifications from their Github each time somebody posts there.
And their alleged Twitter account, though they don't tweet much any more -- they do follow you when you make a little noise about them.
Thank you for the article ... yes, very interesting ... I'm going LONG BCN
Reads like every other article they produce - shit on anything that forked and actually gained significant value, and then go on and on about what a great scam coin BCN was for being "first".. It's 100% bullshit unless you are a BCN bagholder looking to finally dump.
Nice article but a bit biased though.
The article in question is provocative -- on purpose -- I think.
I am still waiting for a reputable organization to release a new investigative piece on the CryptoNote guys. But "reputable" is a charged word. Even the New York Times has had its share of Fake News 'Reporters' etc.
BitcoinTalk and Monero Threads that smell something, but don't really substantiate the allegations, just aren't good enough for the real world. It's not a "court of public opinion."
All coins need to be better investigated, but that is difficult given the "virtual" playing field.