Is that how court works?
False comparison fallacy. This isn't a court.
No, it will do something.
No, not really. Starting absurd threads like these has almost never helped anyone AFAIK.
I'm pretty sure IP logs can show if the hacker logged in from a remote location or not, right? Or the only way to prove it was hacked is to "sign a message", am I right? Sign a message this, sign a message that. If you can't, you're hacked.
- Lauda 2017
You could argue that even a signed message may be inadequate in certain cases. That is the minimum; I am not interested in IP logs.
If someone is ignorant enough to leave a negative trust without any proof, they surely are an "imbecile". Funny enough, there is actually proof for me to call you guys imbeciles, but there is no proof for you to call me anything.
Good luck with your case, and calling us, or anyone else for that matter, "imbeciles" will surely help you.
