feel free to find an old address, i'll likely be able to sign a message, not that I need to prove anything.
We could do that; not that it's necessary. Try this one: 1Fr2qUpHkyyuxmz5APz7ViCp2rM8zRU5ho or 1KcofPMDKQyR87MYxkHFcqf6vJzXPJyxV2.The funny thing is, almost everyone outside of this forum and r/bitcoin thinks core is full of crap.
Yeah.. no. The supermajority of users is with status-quo on any non-BU "community". All long-standing names on IRC et. al. support them and the node count of (emphasis on) aged nodes reflects that.If pointing that out counts in your mind as 'defamation' then guilty as charged. lol
Repetitively attempting to smear my name with the usage of 'shill', more specifically a "Blockstream shill" has nothing to with what you just wrote. If you can provide proof for these claims, then go ahead. If not, then yes, you are guilty.I'm pretty sure i could go back and find a dozen posts where you tried to argue blocks weren't full ,
They were not full.aren't getting full...as they clearly were...
I have not claimed such a thing and if it looks that I have, then those few posts got out of control.now that fees have exploded, instead of acknowledging that people like me were right all along,
You were most certainly not right in anything. the narrative shifts to "well we need segwit" etc....
"You" (just like everyone else) wanted a *solution* to scaling. Solution is provided. Now you claim it is a "narrative shift"? 
but I do know Blockstream/Core is full of crap, they do not have Bitcoin's best interest in mind, and they are liars.
There is no such thing as "Blockstream/Core".