Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Scientific proof that God exists?
by
Horacewoodwood
on 12/06/2017, 11:11:52 UTC
wow so glad i brought this thread back from the dead last year


but i think we need more memes folks, liven the place up a little , these walls of text are making my poor little brain cell hurt.  Grin Cheesy

So anyway here ya go folks...

a video of BADecker  spouting his nonsense in person!!!      comedy gold!
now you may ask, so why does BADecker never link to this retarded web page seeing how he parrots all the pious drivel the site spouts.
simple ...who'd wanna be exposed on bitcointalk for being an  ignorant moron?  (i know this place is full of em, but whatever...)
Sorry BADecker... aka  Ken Ham, i just blew your cover!!  lol



                       http://i.imgur.com/UrCSU2u.jpg
                  


Is this really legit?? I mean is this really badecker?? And wait, are thos dvd's really for sale?? And how did you mange to identify that it is really him?? I mean that's just difficult. But not impossible tho. One last thing, if that is really him, isnt that a bit too much?? I mean that can cause him serious trolling and other things now that his real identity is known..

Is that all you jokers can do? All you can do is attempt to pick on BADecker. You can't really even begin to rebut cause and effect, entropy, and complexity. You can't even begin to rebut the scientific proof that God exists. Pick a point in the proof. Rebut even one point in simple concise language if you can.

You retards belong in a funny farm, right along with the FE people.



Cool


oh jeezus!!! i just had the best belly laugh i've had in years!
oh cmon now, aren't you like  totally flattered that you could be mistaken for the likes of that
god fearin, bible lovin, evolution/science denying, character KEN HAM!!!
Come on dude...he built the   Creation Museum! complete with dinosaurs and humans in the same time period and Noahs Ark and Adam and Eve!!... ROFLMFAO!!!



What does Ken Ham have to do with scientific proof that God exists?

I had thought that within the Bitcointalk forum there would be a few people who understood the difference between science and religion. But here you are, another one focusing on religion rather than science.

Don't any of you jokers know even enough basic science that you can talk science rather than religion?

Cool
Interlude: 'The dream still stays on'
We've seen what we can call 'The end pf Badecker' these days, when he himself debunked his own theory that God created the Universe. Of course, it was foolish of him to let that out and now he is trying to 'repair' his mistake by saying he meant something else, going around the subject, etc. His classical method of deflecting the attention off his mistakes is blaming everyone of involving religion into a scientific subject. The hurtful truth for him, and those like him, is that the subject is of a religious matter, it has a religious motif (God) and it follows the religious story of a certain God. Yes, he claims to 'scientifically' prove the existence of God, but the 'scientific' research is in the domain of religion, so anyone who involves religion in the discussion has all the reasons to do so. Even more, almost all of the religious questions asked here are on subject and are reasonable, they should be answered in order to clarify some 'scientific' claims that bare no proof but assumptions. Badecker can't or won't understand that and he is stuck in his own little loop of mental errors, he is stuck on his same old debunked and pseudo scientific links that nobody cares for anymore. That is why, as we are gathering proof here, we can conclude again that he is indeed really stupid and stubborn in his stupidity. More to come, hang around folks.