I only read till the part that you say they should stop at 1 hour.
Coz at this point you clearly dont read properly.
Why waste my time reading the fud.
They have no reasons to stop in 1 hour even if there no attack and no clogged transaction
because the cap not even reach yet at that time.
Duration: The fundraiser will run for 14 days or until the hidden cap is reached, with a 1 hour minimum time.
https://blog.bancor.network/bancor-network-token-bnt-contribution-token-creation-terms-48cc85a63812You're proven me correct that most of you are a bunch of idiotic sheeple without intelligence.
Reading is hard, huh? And no arguments given, again, no surprise. The fact that you say it yourself that "Coz at this point you clearly dont read properly" means you don't understand anything what you read, which may be a sign of a mental attention disorder.
Quote:
"Clause 14: Initial creation period is
either one hour or until the hidden cap has been reached. It must be at least one hour, but when the hidden cap has not been reached, it will be longer.
Clause 15: Here it clearly states the minimal initial
creation period is 1 hour long. Not more. Not less.Clause 16: "After the Minimal Initial Creation Period,
the Initial Creation Period automatically ends once the Hidden Cap as implemented in the SCS has been reached."
So, the "Minimal Initial Creation" period is one hour long. After that time is up, we're into the Initial Creation Period, which terminates once the hidden cap has been reached. The hidden cap was 250k ETH.
250k ETH was reached at 2 hours, which is after the "Minimal Creation Period" that is very clearly stated to be 1 hour long. Because the hidden cap was reached after the "Minimal Creation Period", the hard cap ends the ICO."
Clearly, you talk non-sense, because it went longer than 2 hours up to
3 hours. Again, where are your arguments?
They're clearly in violation of their own T&C, yet you keep defending with ZERO arguments, pathetic!Just as DigitalNinja is shilling and acting like a clown, by spouting bullshit and opinions, which his posts show only activity in this thread @
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1008945;sa=showPosts;start=60
Contract law (crying laughing face) you do know that a contract has to be signed in wet ink by all parties to stand in law? I sure didnt sign any contract hahaha. I stopped reading there because i know that
See this intelligence of @ DigitalNinja. Contracts don't have to be signed in "wet ink by all parties". You must be blind that one of the other terms was that you're not a US citizen/resident and by contributing, you have given
consensus to this case, which is enough to be used in court against you. You clearly don't understand law at all. For example: Clicking on the terms and agreements at Paypal account creation, you're already binded by the terms in court. I'm getting tired of stupid people like you.
Ok and how exactly does a court prove it was you the (human being) that clicked those terms? If you study common law you will soon realise you are very wrong. This account has a low post count my other does not.
edit - Cryptodude is 1 salty as fk troll. ive seen so many of these types eat their words its unreal. have fun cryptodude while it lasts meanwhile the rest of us will carry on supporting this project. go and pick the toys up you have thrown out of your pram child.