Hah, I was trying to make a remark. Because I think some kind of force is okay, while you think every force is wrong.
But enforcing your idea upon me is already a force. -> so the hypocrisy would be at you.
but not really important, just some blathering, ignore this one.
But seriously:
Feel free to build up a night-watch-state like you want somewhere.
I doubt it's gonna work, but it seems like there are a lot of Bitcoiners who do (because well the decantrilzed money is one of your things)
So there should be quite a lot of people who are rich now or gonna be rich and could buy a small state together (at least if Bitcoin is successful).
I did say please, didn't it? I'm asking you to see it my way; I'm not using force. If I were using force, I'd be at your house, banging on your door, threatening you to open and accept my ideologies as God-given truth or I'd burn your house down with you inside of it.
I believe this is our disconnect; you're still shaky on what "the use of force" is and is not. It's the difference between voluntarism (e.g., you coming to this site was voluntary, whatever you decided to have for lunch was voluntary, doing a little jig on your dining room table was probably voluntary), and coercion. In other words, stateless (voluntary) and state (coercion; force; involuntary.)
P.s., I have no idea what night-watch-state is, but it doesn't sound like something I'd like.