Some of your threads are quite misleading about what you're talking about - for example, there was a thread claiming that Adam Back wanted $100 fees, when in fact he just suggesting that people would be willing to pay that much but directly said he would prefer the fees to be much lower. You also started a thread claiming that Luke Jr wanted people to use fiat, when in fact he was pointing out how ridiculous the alternatives to Bitcoin are (the exact opposite).
It's clear that Lauda would have done this a very long time ago if it was solely about your opinion rather than you acting in this misleading way.
This is not the first time that Lauda has left negative ratings for people for political reasons.
Several months ago, Lauda gave a negative rating to
franky1 that was clearly a political rating (
source), however it was
removed after being called out about it (
archive for both). The difference in this case is that Lauda is not the only one to have given this person a negative rating for political purposes.
I think your concern is that jonald_fyookball's threads/posts are less neutral than you would like, however this is the nature of political discourse. I think you would be hard pressed to find a neutral article regarding President Trump on Fox News, CNN, or MSNBC, and it is fairly common for all of those major news outlets to editorialize stories they pass off as news.
As I mentioned previously, I think that jonald_fyookball should make it more public that it is Blazed who is effectively causing negative ratings to be given for political purposes via Lauda.