Re: [ANN] Lykke - Semi-decentralized Exchange on the Blockchain
kadscuk: It's interesting how everyone else's input and analysis is incorrect while yours is right. Your passive aggressive nature ("I'll be brief because I'm too busy") and comment on my lack of deeper analysis isn't really healthy for discussion either.
Anyway, it seems to me you actually don't hang out on Reddit or Slack enough. Olsen does take the time to reply to our questions, and he also shares general finance stuff from time to time. Of course, to you all of this is calculated and not random.
Lykke has been mentioned a few times now that it's a high-risk investment. This is a common sentiment shared by most of the investors (at least on Slack anyway). Why will Richard Olsen mention it again? To me it's just a reminder. However, with your underlying beliefs it again is a calculated move.
If that isn't implying that Richard Olsenand team is dishonest I don't know what you're trying to say here. That they honestly and intentionally did what they did?
Either way, you have also admitted that you're reading between the lines. So what makes you right and everyone else wrong? For one, we can all agree to disagree but you have to result to insults and telling people who take their time t respond to you that they're taking up space. Or that they are not in the same league as you.
Actually what are you trying to achieve here? What is it that you're trying to tell us? Your solution is not feasible because that would mean Lykke's own coins will either always be in private or always be in trading. Any change that Lykke makes will piss you off it seems, cause it doesn't align with your deep calculations.
A little humility will do you good.
Also it's somewhat troll behaviour for you to raise your concerns but simply disregard everyone else's when they share their point of view.
Anyway, it seems to me you actually don't hang out on Reddit or Slack enough. Olsen does take the time to reply to our questions, and he also shares general finance stuff from time to time. Of course, to you all of this is calculated and not random.
Lykke has been mentioned a few times now that it's a high-risk investment. This is a common sentiment shared by most of the investors (at least on Slack anyway). Why will Richard Olsen mention it again? To me it's just a reminder. However, with your underlying beliefs it again is a calculated move.
Quote
the breach of trust thing is because the initial idea was for the coins bought on the exchange to be the circulating supply, and this was the basis for the market cap figure in coinmarketcap. The pre-investor coins weren't supposed to be on the circulating supply at all. I honestly dont think Olsen is stupid enough to make a schoolboy error in not including the pre-investor coins in the circulating supply. It was INTENTIONAL to not include the pre-investor coins in the circulating supply initially because those are private coins linked to an internal valuation of the company.
If that isn't implying that Richard Olsenand team is dishonest I don't know what you're trying to say here. That they honestly and intentionally did what they did?
Either way, you have also admitted that you're reading between the lines. So what makes you right and everyone else wrong? For one, we can all agree to disagree but you have to result to insults and telling people who take their time t respond to you that they're taking up space. Or that they are not in the same league as you.
Actually what are you trying to achieve here? What is it that you're trying to tell us? Your solution is not feasible because that would mean Lykke's own coins will either always be in private or always be in trading. Any change that Lykke makes will piss you off it seems, cause it doesn't align with your deep calculations.
A little humility will do you good.
Also it's somewhat troll behaviour for you to raise your concerns but simply disregard everyone else's when they share their point of view.