I think this is pretty childish sentiment. A chain split is not an altcoin, and that doesn't matter whether it's UASF, UAHF or just a hard fork. The majority chain is Bitcoin, and the rest are "forks of Bitcoin", nothing more.
No. That's not what Bitcoin is, otherwise a few power players get to decide what Bitcoin is and change however they want it. Bitcoin is supposed to empower the users by giving them sovereignty and being resistant to change. It is not, in any way or form, a proof-of-proxy coin. Anyhow, this is not the place for this discussion. Either way, the rating is not "political" and is well deserved. The user even continued to spread false information.