There was a lot of questioning about the "temporary" 1MB limit several years ago, but I don't know if this holds true today.
it doesn't hold true if you buy into Blockstream propaganda, I suppose.
Christ, this is boring. At least I mentioned the ViaBTC and F2Pool's polls, while you haven't mentioned any information whatsoever except for generic comments about "propaganda". I'm waiting for your response, I'm not anyone's enemy. Chill.
Bitcoin is supposed to empower the users by giving them sovereignty and being resistant to change.
A fork doesn't become an altcoin because of this. It just becomes something unfavourable which Bitcoin has become. If Bitcoin needs to be resistant to change, would UASF be an altcoin too? Or is your view based around the fact that BITMAIN is dictating this UAHF?
IMO at this point any fork would be a few private companies dictating the decision, just a few more in UASF's case than in UAHF.
Anyhow, this is not the place for this discussion. Either way, the rating is not "political" and is well deserved. The user even continued to spread false information.
Got it, I'd better leave the thread now. It's not going anywhere so jonald should probably lock it.