OK, so, force is moral if the suffering inflicted is outweighed by the suffering prevented?
Does that sound acceptable?
It's difficult to know how much "suffering prevented is", especially if it lies in the future, so it's a bit problematic.
But yes.
A lot of people are dying because there isn't enough organ donors. By killing you and distributing your organs, we could
save a lot of lives. The math is pretty simple in this case. Would you support this idea? Or are you an exemption to
your own rules?