That is actually a decent idea, albeit it needs to follow the Wiki table + possible additions as added by DooMAD. If he does not want to pick that up, I could create a thread (albeit it would need to be limited to e.g. people without negative trust; people above certain rank; in order to reduce shilling/manipulation).
Thread is up. I doubt I'll be bothering to check everyone's reputation feedback, but I can probably divvy up the list by membership rank if that's important. Also, in the interest of balance, should we include things like 8MB if miners are still signalling that?
What makes you think that allowing positive trust and/or high ranked members is going to produce useful information?
That was my initial feeling, but I suppose it's not beyond the realm of possibility that people might make a new account just to skew the results.