Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ICO] SONM: Supercomputer Organized by Network Mining
by
AnfisKatechkin
on 16/06/2017, 20:13:41 UTC

Point is that some investors have received the same deposit addresses not unique http://gastracker.io/addr/0xe77d26b80d5732efcba6422f9ebd7c5c31666d51 It means that devs can't know who sent all these ETC.
I sent 143 ETC from 0xF4bb95Ab5182aD6c4fE9aA48Edd39Ad14D85c8FD
The only right decision to solve this issue is to return all funds.

Even if you received a non-unique address are every single transaction ID the same too?...

Didn't you do a test send and see that it was a non-unique address?

They're not gonna 'return all funds' because of an issue, they'll likely just have an audit...it's possible, and it's happening with every like 1/3 ICO's.

Next time you go to put into an ICO, don't just send em. THIS is why I like to use ETH if it's a smart contract address, it took me like literally 5-10 minutes of setting up some trades and 30 minutes of doing stuff round the house for the trade prices to hit.

Then I withdrew to address, sent from address.

I seriously don't understand why people went through the hassle of using all the different tokens but oh well I got my SOMN on my address withing like 1.5 minutes of sending the ETH

Are you kidding?  In the instruction was written that the deposit address is unique. I trusted the devs and it's normal. If you look at a deposit address that I provided you'll see that the wallet has just 1000 ETC and it has no problem to return these funds to investors. Devs should solve this issue asap. Investors are depressed. They did everything as it was in the instruction.