I am older retired person 60 and I can tell you a little about USA law and I see nothing wrong with the caution used by dt list. in the case of Muhammed Zakir or boldar. If some one wants to write up a better method please do I would look at it and push it if it looked good.
The best one written was even better than my prior suggestions.
Theymos ignored it like he ignores everything else.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1913408.msg19011283#msg19011283
Quote from: AztekPhoenix
It is interesting that with a admitted flawed trust system, and an over aggressive ex staff member,
that all of you want to blame the one pointing out the flaws and instead of agreeing something needs to be done to fix the system
that all of you want to blame the one pointing out the flaws and instead of agreeing something needs to be done to fix the system
Quote from: minifrij
Please, enlighten us on how we can fix the system.
It's extremely easy to say that a system is broken. Providing a fix that makes sense and doesn't just move the issues somewhere else is significantly harder.
It's extremely easy to say that a system is broken. Providing a fix that makes sense and doesn't just move the issues somewhere else is significantly harder.
Quote from: AztekPhoenix
Not difficult at all , modify the system so you can PM a Trust group request to another member for say 7 or 14 or 30 days or whatever time is needed,
if that member accepts the trust group request, their names are entered into a database, so that they can then rate any person in their group for up to that time period, once the time period expires, no further ratings are possible unless a new trust group PM is sent out and accepted.
All ratings from a Trust Group have equal weight, nothing is untrusted as both parties agreed to it ahead of time.
So no trust monarchy and no bad ratings from people just because they don't like what the other says.
if that member accepts the trust group request, their names are entered into a database, so that they can then rate any person in their group for up to that time period, once the time period expires, no further ratings are possible unless a new trust group PM is sent out and accepted.
All ratings from a Trust Group have equal weight, nothing is untrusted as both parties agreed to it ahead of time.
So no trust monarchy and no bad ratings from people just because they don't like what the other says.
