Re: [ANN][XRB]Cryptocurrency's killer app: RaiBlocks micropayments
My view is that actual donation rate is good. 5-8% as I saw.
When we started this project we invested some money and a lot of time, some headache still now happens.
This is also a free give away, no ICO, no pre-sell, no special hw required. I really can't figure out what's wrong.
There are a lot of coin wih ICO or binding % to dev.
Explain again the donation:
- 5% to donator -> instant help, it's hard to win the 100 Mrai
- 100 Mrai -> long time help, hard to get but it give satisfaction for donator.
I think it's balanced.
When we started this project we invested some money and a lot of time, some headache still now happens.
This is also a free give away, no ICO, no pre-sell, no special hw required. I really can't figure out what's wrong.
There are a lot of coin wih ICO or binding % to dev.
Explain again the donation:
- 5% to donator -> instant help, it's hard to win the 100 Mrai
- 100 Mrai -> long time help, hard to get but it give satisfaction for donator.
I think it's balanced.
Like I said before, I definitely appreciate the hard work that's gone into making xrb a great coin.
My main problem is with the 5% to donator, it forces you to donate because the cost of not donating is too much.
I think it's very unbalanced and I predict donation rate will increase to 10%+ as the number of claims increase.
Maybe I'm just being too idealistic about the fairness of the distribution.
I AM A DELUDED, GREEDY, SELF-ENTITLED FUCKING WHINY BITCH!
Maybe we should all send you all the MRAI we have but am pretty certain you'll still find something to complain about...
Why don't you just leave XRB and look for other coins which you deem to be fairer?
You'd do me and yourself a huge favour.
If that's what you got from my post, I suggest you read it again. You are just resorting to ad hominem attacks.
...
I have one question: In terms of fairness of distribution, would it be fairer if 5% was removed?