As usual, this is a pure troll thread, caused not by an evil conspiracy to control bitcoin, but by a too-tight tinfoil hat.
Not so. If they desire to be transparent they'll produce the legally executed articles of incorporation. They could legally assign ownership to an individual that provides a key, but why wouldn't they produce the signed agreement?
They need to let us know how transparent they want to be!
You "do contracts all the time"? That must be hard for a guy that apparently can't read.
There is no ownership. That means that there was no "legally assign ownership" either.
Members are not owners. You seem to have missed that in my previous post. Is bold enough, or should I change the font size too?
At least you have stopped thinking that corporations are created by contract. You may get your merit badge in internet lawyering yet.