Re: LushCoin White Paper - AI and Blockchain Redefining Money

If you can create and use an AI that is fair in its evaluation and can evaluate all kinds of events fairly, you would not be posting here. The impact a business idea or proposal has is based on too many inputs, the same inputs can have different weights to different humans for examples too different VCs, how do you ensure fairness and correctness unless you know the future? Eventually every single outcome would depend on public scrutiny rather than AI, and with that the person who controls the crowd gets to have his or her proposal approved.

Why would I not post here? I don't get that part.

-snip-

Firstly the submitted idea gets tested for originality, without which it will not progress to any sort of public scrutiny. A person cannot hope to control the crowd when they do not know the outcome of the AI originality test. Public scrutiny is mainly to vet logic, usefulness, benefits, negative impacts etc. As an extreme example; a community will most likely reject an idea for building dirt cheap houses out of toxic waste. The crowd will act in its own interest.

After passing the originality test, the strength of the ideas connections to society are measured. How useful is it? How connected is it to such local factors as education levels, suppliers etc? This is all done by AI.
Everything in the world is part of a network, therefore network methods work quite well to resolve systems where there are multiple inputs. For instance, LushCoins preferred method for measuring strengths is network accessibility, a method which has already been successful in epidemiology for modelling the spread of disease (weighting, varied inputs and all).
Weighting can be obtained from random walks on corpora (eg Wikipedia), World Bank data etc.
Number of inputs = no problem.

-snip

Based from your mindmutiny website, you are alone so how can the innovators trust you if your professional background is not that strong to receive those ideas & test for whatever you want it to be.
I'm not convinced on how you deal with this kind of project. Usually, such novel ideas are submitted to a panel of technical experts and the process is very tedious.
This one is not really plausible at all.

i do have to agree... the plausibility is certainly inadequate! simply for a few very tried and tested procedures...
1:) while working with the patent... there has to be a very large and cumulative resource dedicated to assuring the rightful owner is not infringing on others. ...
so while this simple algo would try to do the same thing it would be like writing an entire paper and changing or omitting a single letter and allowing the patent to pass because of the missing or changed letter in the project even if everything else is identical to another project or patent!
2:) the verification process if automated by a computer will not be able to do real world verification of the KYC and credentials of the person applying for it!

there are several other aspects of this would have a large backlash and would have this rejected at any patent lawyers office! and if people are to credit this as a way to get things patented then they are very sorrily mistaken!
the process of this is very well defined and tested in every aspect and cannot be replaced by AI as it is a REAL WORLD Investigation that will allow this to be acknowledged!