Why would I give money to an organization where the majority can vote against me, instead of just donating it to something specific I personally support?
You can donate it to an organization which claims to support your goals and then decides how to spend it without any vote whatsoever. I don't see how that is better. Or you can just donate to very very niche things and dilute your voice.
I think there's room in between for a
organization that listens to members. referring to emboldened text: as long as the members are not part of a special breed of elite secret society that requires a large fee and a secret handshake to become a member. other wise the COMMUNITY's voice is again ignored (EG bitcoinfoundation)
forming a membership platform may weed out cloned accounts but it is always going to have a limited voice compared to the millions of users