Which means we would necessarily have to tolerate any Stolfi or Lambchop types even if they did piss us off.
I think this is mostly true, especially for Stolfi.
Notlambchop, on the other hand, did cross some lines, which was when he would post distracting and irrelevant bullshit.
These moderating ideas can be tough - even though I agree that the default should remain a kind of tolerance, especially if there is arguable substance.
By the way, group moderating seems like a bit of a mess - but if you can think of a way to make it work, then it could be a decent experiment.