Look sorry excuse me for my squeamishness here, but I do find it disconcerting that a cryptocurrency exchange representative on a public forum like this swears in the hardest terms not once but twice at a poster and potential customer.
I was considering putting a few BTC to trade alts on cryptopia, pottymouth hasn't really made me more confident to do so, although I may or may not do that anyway.
Don't get me wrong, I think you are right about delisting low difficulty coins when the chain can be attacked. Isn't there a better way to say this in a professional context other than "fuck" and "fucking"?
So what are you proposing? That we just continue to allow low difficulty networks to be exploited by people with large amounts of hash to throw around. To let them slowly make us not liquid in a bunch of alts and bleed BTC from unsuspecting users? And I suppose we should also have to cover this all ourselves rather than address the problem at hand?
Or, we could start delisting these coins that have demonstrated that they are unable to sufficiently secure their networks so that we can prevent ourselves and our users from losing coins.
If you don't understand the reasoning behind the action we're taking then you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Behave yourself!
You claimed without any evidence or understanding that we're abusing confirmations to manipulate markets and give ourselves some kind of trading advantage. You fucking behave yourself.