See:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1993570.0I will declare a poll winner by considering who voted what, not just by counting votes.
Polls on forum administration are always advisory, but in this case I don't care very much who owns the thread, so I don't see any reason why I wouldn't put the winner of this poll in charge of the thread. Though if the thread becomes problematic again, the thread owner will have to be replaced.
lightfoot -
"I would go with a largely hands-off option, no directly blasting other people, no posting marketing crap, simple stuff"
arklan -
"if mods are needed, i have the time to do it"
Erkallys-
"I candidate if this is needed. At least I have no hatred toward me as well as any fanboy." - "I would not be too strict on moderation, and I am available all day long."
infofront-
"I'm not a prolific poster, or well known personality, but I'd volunteer to help moderate. I started the "unmoderated" wall observer thread because I believe in the laissez-faire nature of Adam's thread."
Lauda -
"I could create one, and would if someone were to get something like ChartBuddy running again." <-- from another thread but related to this one.
empowering -
"I probably have the necessary erratic mental health condition..." "...So I guess I will throw my hat in - happy to do it, not fussed either though."