Yes, Colombo. You have figured it out, I am a dishonest computer. Beep Boop.
You so smart, now go make another account and accuse someone else of being me.
(Which is really just me accusing me of being me though, but who isn't me, right?)
You so smart, now go make another account and accuse someone else of being me.
(Which is really just me accusing me of being me though, but who isn't me, right?)
Your words are worthless, it's proven that you're like the thief that was caught stealing and was captured on camera, everyone already saw the replay, but you'd still lie your ass off like a good little sociopath.
Wow, look at that replay. Slow that down to half speed now.
That's a good look'n ass right there, if I could say so myself.
Hey, where did you get this video from? Is this my bathroom?
Did Chinese intelligence give this to you? You sick bastard.
Ahh, that attitude again, looks like you're still proud of your lying.
Let's make you famous for it.
Let's pick some AgentofCoin classic, there is just so much to choose from.
AgentofCoin's Sociopathic Gem #1 - Flat out rewrite history then blame you for it.
Here, we can see AgentofCoin is clearing stating the signing of HK Agreement is meaningless. He's cocky as shit about it too:
"First off, the fact that Jihan signed the HK Agreement doesn't mean anything of any value in relation to this current ASICBoost issue. So, I'll give you 0.5 points for your first fact. Half a point because Jihan signed it, but that doesn't prove anything at issue."
3 pages later, after all his bullshit were busted, he rewrites history:
My simple premise all along: "If Bitmain...do not think patching ASICboost is appropriate...why did they originally... sign the HK agreement...?"
So our little sociopath here just changed his story 180 degree after 3 pages.
This isn't even the best part, the best part comes after:
You are missing my major point as usual
If you read what I wrote prior and weren't so superficial and stuck in your box
then you would understand my argument is based on a simple premise
You have never addressed this simple issue.
Yet I do not recall you ever addressing this or providing your theory as to this aspect.
You keep going around in circles without directly providing a possible puzzle piece to my simple premise.
If you read what I wrote prior and weren't so superficial and stuck in your box
then you would understand my argument is based on a simple premise
You have never addressed this simple issue.
Yet I do not recall you ever addressing this or providing your theory as to this aspect.
You keep going around in circles without directly providing a possible puzzle piece to my simple premise.
So according to AgentofCoin, it's your fault for not addressing something he just made up.
Something that he stated was meaningless 3 pages ago.
And because he rewrote history, you're now "stuck in your box", "keep going around in circles", "You have never addressed this simple issue".
You think that's all? Nope, this completes the set:
You have changed your original argument and can't admit that because you are a weak child
who needs to cover their flaws like a child who mistakenly shat their pants.
who needs to cover their flaws like a child who mistakenly shat their pants.
LOL, you can't make this stuff up, very sociopathic, but you have to admire that blatant straight face lying and accusing.
Let's give our little resident sociopath AgentofCoin a round of applause.
You think this is a one time deal? Nope, there's a lot more, you just have to see to believe.
Let me know if you want more.