Let's pick another AgentofCoin Sociopathic classic.
AgentofCoin's Sociopathic Gem #2 - When lies are busted, keep making accusations.Now in this replay, we see that AgentofCoin insists that, when Jihan signed the HK Agreement in early 2016, it was impossible for Jinha to learn that SegWit would break ASICBoost.
You were insinuating that Jihan understood when signing the HK Agreement that SegWit
would break his ASICBoost, so he signed it in good faith and with knowledge. I merely pointed out that was impossible in the timeline of events.
So you show him the SegWit Github commit that proved the miners had 28 days to learn SegWit would break ASICBoost, not "impossible in the timeline of events":
Now let's do a reality check:1. The 'Hong Kong Agreement' was signed on 21st Feb 2016. (
Source).
2. The 12th Jan 2016 version of BIP-141 (SegWit), is already incompatible with ASICBoost (
Link).
3. This is further clarified on the 24th Jan 2016
'Clarify txid and wtxid' update of BIP-141 (SegWit).
4. I repeat:
SegWit has been factually proven to be incompatible with ASICBoost since 24th Jan 2016.
7. The one thing that made ASICBoost useless, the 'witness root hash', was already defined in 24th Jan 2016,
28 days before the signing of the agreement. Now at this point, you'd expect a normal person to either reply with counter proofs, or admit he made a mistake, or just stfu, right?
Nope, not our little sociopath, our little sociopath doubles down like his job depends on it.
You're not going to believe his reply:
What your fatal flaw in your reasoning is that your timeline of events does not expound upon anything other than what the community already knows.
You do not attempt to understand why things occurred as they did.
You use what superficially did occur, as evidence of miners individual innocence and good faith. That is an incorrect connection and cannot be found in your outline.
What you are accusing me of, is exactly what you are now doing. What your current argument really is, is that since a person came to the police station and willingly gave some information about a murder, that person must not be the murderer.
You wanted to attack my passing statement to Jonald so strongly that you were blinded to the fact that your explanation doesnt disprove what my opinion was intended to convey.
You nitpicked my wording to Jonald, which in the past you accused me of doing incorrectly.
You are a big hypocritical mess. My statement to Jonald was intended to point out that he was assuming good faith of some miners during the HK meeting and that was his only basis of belief.
Nope, I didn't make this shit up, that was his actual reply.
He "merely pointed out that was impossible".
So you merely pointed out that it was.
Suddenly there is 5 paragraphs of "your fault" "your fault" "your fault".
You just have to admire this level of rapid expulsion of bullshit, it's like an art.
I mean who the hell even talks that way?
He just keeps doubling down like no tomorrow, he does this for pages and pages, and he's proud of it.
That's why I've decided to make him famous, this guy deserves a medal.
If you think this is amazing, there is a lot more, you just can't believe the shit that came out of this guy's mouth.