I'll ignore apparent vote-stuffing completely.
Probably I'll be able to tell the proper ordering by just skimming the color-coded voter list. In edge cases, I might devise some sort of point system.
Thanks.Probably I'll be able to tell the proper ordering by just skimming the color-coded voter list. In edge cases, I might devise some sort of point system.
Lauda is in the lead atm? Who would have thought.... 
Indeed. Then again, I almost don't know the people listed and had expected others to be candidates(?).I do not. When he was a Mod, I asked Lauda why posts I had written were deletd and r0ach's anti-semitic hate posts were untouched on the same page.
He did not answer.
For me intolerance to the point of advocating genocide and the killing of millions of people is NOT really ok. It's kind a red line issue.
So in the interests of an open debate, what is your position Lauda? Do you just crave the power? Can you tell us if you're a light touch, laissez-faire type, or a totalitarian?
Rule wise, I think no altcoin talk and no anti-semitic hate stuff (et. al.) is fair and not too restrictive.He did not answer.
For me intolerance to the point of advocating genocide and the killing of millions of people is NOT really ok. It's kind a red line issue.
So in the interests of an open debate, what is your position Lauda? Do you just crave the power? Can you tell us if you're a light touch, laissez-faire type, or a totalitarian?
For example, I say "ETH's system encourages maximalism because it attempts to have all altcoins built on its platform and bring all the hype with it. To insult people for 'Bitcoin maximalism' is plain dumb if the altcoin you're promoting directly tries to trigger it's own maximalism'".
Would that sort of post be okay and discussion about that topic?