Re: Mining for the non-profit sector. Need to exceed 2 mBTC per day per 1070…
It's not that I'm not listening, it's that my funders have already rejected the options you were giving me AND I'VE BEEN TELLING TOU GUYS THAT OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN but no one is listening to me. The only path forward they've given me is "an app that is as user-friendly as NiceHash but without the commercial license limitation."
My first proposal for this project was built around mining Zcash and converting it to bitcoins to CAD on behalf of beneficiaries, but they rejected on the grounds that: (1) MY organization can not touch the value mined in beneficiaries' homes, and (2) training beneficiaries' parents and guardians in cryptocurrency trading is completely off the table. This is why every "solution" that says "then all you have to do is edit a .bat file" or "all you have to do is exchange it for bitcoin" I've been ignoring because I've already bashed my head against that brick wall with my funders several times already. I know. It sounds crazy and stupid and pointless but it's not my money so it's not up to me and I feel like everyone in this thread is just shooting the messenger.
Everyone here would rather tell me how crazy and stupid my funders are being and not one of you wants to leverage the power of potentially thousands of core i5's to mine from without having to worry about electricity costs. I don't know how no one on here doesn't see this as a sweetheart deal but we've all already acknowledged that if you represent charitable organization with conservative governance and ethics rules that you're an idiot who doesn't deserve anyone's help or the chance to help anyone else. Mods, please lock, delete, and kill this thread with fire assuming all the previous flaming has left more than ashes.
My first proposal for this project was built around mining Zcash and converting it to bitcoins to CAD on behalf of beneficiaries, but they rejected on the grounds that: (1) MY organization can not touch the value mined in beneficiaries' homes, and (2) training beneficiaries' parents and guardians in cryptocurrency trading is completely off the table. This is why every "solution" that says "then all you have to do is edit a .bat file" or "all you have to do is exchange it for bitcoin" I've been ignoring because I've already bashed my head against that brick wall with my funders several times already. I know. It sounds crazy and stupid and pointless but it's not my money so it's not up to me and I feel like everyone in this thread is just shooting the messenger.
Everyone here would rather tell me how crazy and stupid my funders are being and not one of you wants to leverage the power of potentially thousands of core i5's to mine from without having to worry about electricity costs. I don't know how no one on here doesn't see this as a sweetheart deal but we've all already acknowledged that if you represent charitable organization with conservative governance and ethics rules that you're an idiot who doesn't deserve anyone's help or the chance to help anyone else. Mods, please lock, delete, and kill this thread with fire assuming all the previous flaming has left more than ashes.
i dont care about your proprosal and suggest that you be more realistic about your incomes. as some people have said, there are a lot of variables when it comes to mining. income can vary heavily depending on these variables. if you stick to the 3000 day plan, your warranty will be way passed their coverage. if you are able to mine for 3000 days straight, then that will create outstanding returns. but all that is if you are able to mine 3000 days straight on those cards
. by reading you proposal, i already know this is not something i would like to invest in, even if i was funding it for fun. get real about your incomes before going into mining.