Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: I don't see why big blocks are a problem, even 10 MB blocks right now aren't.
by
Lauda
on 13/07/2017, 21:02:12 UTC
Are you kidding? I run a full node on my Core I7-4790k 4.0ghz, use it daily for other things, including games, video editing/conversion and check my wallet data periodically and had no problems. So what is your issue?
Periodically? Are you sure you are not running a non-listening node? Mine eats up over 1 TB of bandwidth per month very easily and I can't possibly imagine running the node on the same system that I use for work (not even with the current block size).
I have no idea of my bandwidth (don't check at all) as i have optic fibre in UK and not some crappy telephone copper wire that other internet services provides. Mine has no cap at all, unlike other internet services. I download all my favourite TV programs as i don't have 18 to 20 minutes per hour to waste on watching adverts. My network traffic on my wallet shows the usual download of new blocks but sending out more, roughly 1gb daily. I have the usual 8 outbound and on average 5 inbound (tends to fluctuate as my wallet auto banned some inbound connections for some reason)
"Crappy telephone copper wire"? What has this got to do with anything? It is very clear that you have no idea what you're talking about and there must be a reason for the low number of inbound connections. A true and longstanding node will easily hit the default cap of 125 connections. If you have optic fibre (100 or 1000 Mbps upload speed), then you should be spending at least several TB of bandwidth per month (not 1 GB per day).
Either your IP is dynamic or something else is limiting your Bitcoin node.

Based on my experience, i can not fathom why others are complaining.
"I am comfortable with $100 fees. Based on my experience, I can not fathom why others are complaining about $5 fees." - Do you not see how statements like this yours are fundamentally flawed?