tesar, you're right, it's under 7.0 and I had to read twice until I saw it XD *so tired*
I currently try it using 9.7, no visible error messages yet
by the way, how do I notice stale shares with nanopool? If the number of shared mentioned there is the same as claymore reports, does it mean that there was no stale share?
it would be nice to add a workername (or if nodevfee it would use the same as the one set on claymore), but oh well
I currently try it using 9.7, no visible error messages yet
by the way, how do I notice stale shares with nanopool? If the number of shared mentioned there is the same as claymore reports, does it mean that there was no stale share?
it would be nice to add a workername (or if nodevfee it would use the same as the one set on claymore), but oh well
I switched from nanopool to ethermine.. I dont remember seeing stale shares being reported on nanopool, not sure if they pay for stale shares like ethermine.
are you sure that ethermine still pays for stale shares?
Not really sure, read somewhere they did.